Thursday, June 4, 2009
Crazy Bird #4
After reading the last part of One Flew Over the Cuckoo's nest I have decided to base my last blog on the character McMurphy. In my previous three blogs I have always ended asking the question is McMurphy really crazy and in my opinion is he's not. In my own views I believe McMurphy is just a con artist. A con artist also known as confidence man which basically defines McMurphy's character. McMurphy enters the hospital with a whole lot of spunk and instantly becomes the patients "hero." With his witty remarks and cleaver ideas McMurphy showed that he was not afraid of his hospital fate. McMurphy clearly knew he was not crazy and in reality he just had a messed up childhood. Getting attention was he's number one priority and being neglected was not an option. So to obtain some attention McMurphy began to act out in ways that people did not like. Because people did not like the way he acted they went against him saying he was insane. McMurphy is the type of person that will not change for any one and because of this strong trait he carries it eventually leads to his demise.
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
Crazy Nest # 3
At the end of Part 3 McMurphy's mood drastically changes and Bromden is the first to notice this. Was seeing McMurphy's past a reason for his sudden mood change or was it just the fact that he missed the outside world? The fishing trip gave the men in the ward a mental boost and abled them to act like civilized people. They were able to communicate with people other then the nurses, helpers and the other patients. Coming home from the trip definitely would have put a downer on my mood but for all the men besides McMurphy were in high spirits. Has McMurphy final realized he is just like then men in the ward and that his future will be the same as theirs?
McMurphy is a strong character but like everyone we have a weak spot and for McMurphy I believe its the outside world. He has been a manipulator since he was ten years old and has used that to his advantage in the work world and his own life. Now that he is in the hospital his tricks and manipulation are finally catching up to him. If he were to stop his madness would he be were he is now or the be person he is? All my questions lead up to my initial question since McMurphy's entered this novel and that is, is McMurphy really crazy or does he just like the attention?
McMurphy is a strong character but like everyone we have a weak spot and for McMurphy I believe its the outside world. He has been a manipulator since he was ten years old and has used that to his advantage in the work world and his own life. Now that he is in the hospital his tricks and manipulation are finally catching up to him. If he were to stop his madness would he be were he is now or the be person he is? All my questions lead up to my initial question since McMurphy's entered this novel and that is, is McMurphy really crazy or does he just like the attention?
Sunday, May 17, 2009
Cuckoo's Nest #2
Was McMurphy the cause of Cheswick's death? Was his death an accident or was it suicide? Since McMurphy has entered the hospital he has definitely shaken things up in there. By rebelling and voicing his opinions has made him the an ideal leader for the other patients to look up too. With McMurphy's presence there the patients feel they now can voice thier own opinions more freely and have the feeling of being invincible due to his presence. This was clearly the case for Cheswick an acute patient at the hospital. Cheswick began rebelling against the nurse and speaking his mind more often because he knew that McMurphy would back him up. As soon as McMurphy found that the staff was responsible for how long his stay would last after his mandatory time he began to conform to the rules. Cheswick becomes outraged during a group meeting and then is sent to the distrubed ward shortly after his return Cheswick dies. Was Cheswick so fad up with the hospital that he wanted to take his life? Was his death due to his visit to the disturbed ward?
Cheswick's experience up at the disturbed ward could have been a factor in his supposed suicide. With his short time up there Cheswick might have realized that with his permanent stay at the hospital will just get worse and felt that he did not need to live anymore. McMurphy could have also been a factor in Cheswick's death. To Cheswick, McMurphy was some one who was going to save them all and after McMurphy's decision to confirm Cheswick finally ran out of hope that some day he would be able get out of the hospital. Or Cheswick's death could have been a mire accident just as the book explains it to be with out looking deeper into his death. There are many ways us readers can look at Cheswick's death, all depending on how you interpret the story and its characters. For me Cheswick's death was a mire accident, which was just another unfortunate event that had happened to Cheswick.
Cheswick's experience up at the disturbed ward could have been a factor in his supposed suicide. With his short time up there Cheswick might have realized that with his permanent stay at the hospital will just get worse and felt that he did not need to live anymore. McMurphy could have also been a factor in Cheswick's death. To Cheswick, McMurphy was some one who was going to save them all and after McMurphy's decision to confirm Cheswick finally ran out of hope that some day he would be able get out of the hospital. Or Cheswick's death could have been a mire accident just as the book explains it to be with out looking deeper into his death. There are many ways us readers can look at Cheswick's death, all depending on how you interpret the story and its characters. For me Cheswick's death was a mire accident, which was just another unfortunate event that had happened to Cheswick.
Friday, May 15, 2009
Cuckoo's Nest #1
Fog. What does the fog represent? And is Bromden the only that can see this fog? Since Bromden's stay in the hospital he has be subjected to the so called "fog machine." The fog clouds Bromden's vision but at the same time gives him a sense of security. I believe that the structured routines' of the hospital bring out the fog for Bromden. Bromden has came accustomed to his daily tasks and is almost like a zombie in a way, which is how Nurse Ratched wants the hospital to be ran. Also maybe in his life before the hospital, he mostly likely lived a structured life due to his tribe and their laws. Following the rules his whole life is what keeps Bromden in fog but if he were to break out of his shell and do something out of the ordinary it just maybe bring him out of that daze. But would Bromden do this or will the sense of security the fog brings hold him back the remainder of his life. Playing safe and conforming to the rules is what I believe keeps bringing the fog back. If Bromden's actions were to change would the fog still be there? The fog slowly drifts away for Bromden as soon as McMurphy comes into the picture. McMurphy brings a change and that is exactly what Bromden needs to be "free" again.
I believe any one sane or insane can see the "fog" or something else that resembles it instead. Being punished for a week during the summer brought me into a daze for the whole week. Everyday i woke up, ate breakfast and had the whole day to myself. I would sit around and do nothing each day. During the week i felt as if the days went by aimlessly and nothing had phased me, which is basically how Bromden feels everyday. After being off punishment and going out again with my friends and doing what i wanted i felt out of my comfort zone. Being cooped up in my house for so long I had got so use to it that being outside again and doing things with my friends didn't seem right to me. I can relate to Bromden's "fog" in ways and understand how he feels once McMurphy enters the hospital. If you don't create change, change will create you.
I believe any one sane or insane can see the "fog" or something else that resembles it instead. Being punished for a week during the summer brought me into a daze for the whole week. Everyday i woke up, ate breakfast and had the whole day to myself. I would sit around and do nothing each day. During the week i felt as if the days went by aimlessly and nothing had phased me, which is basically how Bromden feels everyday. After being off punishment and going out again with my friends and doing what i wanted i felt out of my comfort zone. Being cooped up in my house for so long I had got so use to it that being outside again and doing things with my friends didn't seem right to me. I can relate to Bromden's "fog" in ways and understand how he feels once McMurphy enters the hospital. If you don't create change, change will create you.
Monday, May 4, 2009
Hamlet Post #3
This week in my blog I would like to continue discussing our conversation with our visitors from the Lantern Theater Company. In class we discussed the play and how the actors portrayed the characters. One of the main things that we focused on was Ophelia's character and her actions. After listening to my peers and our visitors from the Lantern Theater Company I have pondered the idea that Ophelia was just as crazy as Hamlet was. I believe that Ophelia's family was trying to hide the fact that Opehlia was just as "mad" as Hamlet. By forbidding her to see Hamlet, her family probably thought it could keep her sane and her being with Hamlet would just bring out the worst in her and trigger an episode just like his. Once Opehlia's father dies there is no one there to hold her back and to keep her secluded. I believe when Ophelia starts acting up towards the end of the play, that that is the real Opehlia that has been hiding the whole play. Opehlia's character has so much more to her then the audience sees and I believe that Shakespeare should have elaborated on her character more. Opehlia could have brought just as much to the table as Hamlet did and even more, only if her character wasn't so held back. *In this blog I would like my reader to focus on the character Ophelia. Think about how she is portrayed in this play and the potential Opehlia of had if her character was explained more.
Saturday, April 18, 2009
Hamlet Post #2
Something I would like to discuss in Act II would be Ophelia's love for Hamlet. As in act I, scene iii Ophelia is told by her father Polonius that she is forbidden to see Hamlet. In the beginning of scene i of act II, Ophelia runs to her father proclaiming that Halmet has confronted her wild-eyed and unkempt, by grabbing and holding her without uttering a word. With the information given to Polonuius by his daughter he then wants to tell the King and Queen, assuming that the reason why Hamlet has gone mad is because of his love from his daughter. Ophelia is said to love Hamlet, but if Ophelia really loved Hamlet would she have ran and told her father about their confrontation? Is Ophelia's love for Hamlet as true as Hamlet's love for her? These are the questions that I have came up while reading Act II.
Ophelia is a young beautiful girl who obeys not only her father but her brother too. Ophelia is demanded not to see Hamlet despite of her feelings for him, in Act I, scene iii. Ophelia obeys her father’s wishes by running back to tell her father of Hamlet and hers confrontation. After reading this part in the play, I have come to second guess Ophelia’s love for Hamlet. If Ophelia was really in love with Hamlet and cared about him deeply why did she go back to her father telling him of their meeting? By doing this Ophelia not only put Hamlet in a bad position but put herself in one as well. With evidence of Hamlet acting erratically, it surely brings the rumors of his madness to a truce. If Ophelia truly cared about Hamlet, my first thought would have been that she would of not told her father of their confrontation. This would have saved Hamlet from new speculations of his madness. If I were in Ophelia’s position I would have done anything to make sure Hamlet was not accused of madness and me being the reason for current mood/actions. Would Hamlet have done this to Ophelia if he were in her position? Or was Ophelia just scared to disobey her father? Each line in this play that is spoken has a hidden meaning be hide it and initially leads to the plot in this play.
*While reading my blog I would like my readers to first think about Hamlet's and Ophelia's love, after doing so then i would like you to take my question inconsideration. Read my ideas and beliefs about their love and compare them with yours. Where my ideas convincing? Also I would like my readers to look at the mechanical conventions in my blog, making sure it flows correctly.
Ophelia is a young beautiful girl who obeys not only her father but her brother too. Ophelia is demanded not to see Hamlet despite of her feelings for him, in Act I, scene iii. Ophelia obeys her father’s wishes by running back to tell her father of Hamlet and hers confrontation. After reading this part in the play, I have come to second guess Ophelia’s love for Hamlet. If Ophelia was really in love with Hamlet and cared about him deeply why did she go back to her father telling him of their meeting? By doing this Ophelia not only put Hamlet in a bad position but put herself in one as well. With evidence of Hamlet acting erratically, it surely brings the rumors of his madness to a truce. If Ophelia truly cared about Hamlet, my first thought would have been that she would of not told her father of their confrontation. This would have saved Hamlet from new speculations of his madness. If I were in Ophelia’s position I would have done anything to make sure Hamlet was not accused of madness and me being the reason for current mood/actions. Would Hamlet have done this to Ophelia if he were in her position? Or was Ophelia just scared to disobey her father? Each line in this play that is spoken has a hidden meaning be hide it and initially leads to the plot in this play.
*While reading my blog I would like my readers to first think about Hamlet's and Ophelia's love, after doing so then i would like you to take my question inconsideration. Read my ideas and beliefs about their love and compare them with yours. Where my ideas convincing? Also I would like my readers to look at the mechanical conventions in my blog, making sure it flows correctly.
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
Hamlet
After reading the blog and the questions that were accumulated I have decided to focus on the aspect of belief and perception in Act I, scenes I and II of Hamlet. In the beginning of Act I Bernardo, Marcellus and Horatio all claim that they have seen the ghost of the late King Hamlet. My question is do they really see the ghost and/or is the image of the ghost just a scheme from these men.
The first thing I would like to approach is, if the image of the ghost is real. I believe this depends on the reader and the writer. Obviously Shakespeare believes in the ghost/spirits aspects, and decides that he wants the ghost to represent something which is the late King Hamlet. Now if you were the reader and had a strong belief that ghost are not real and do not have any meaning to them, then this will have an impact on how you perceive the story. As for me ghost are not real, so reading this section in the play made me ponder the idea of the whole “ghost” thing as being a scheme.
The reason behind believing that the appearance of the ghost is a scheme is because the men who have claimed to seen this ghost might have something against Hamlet or his family. They could then use the appearance of the ghost to their advantage to persuade Hamlet with their thoughts and ideas. The men claim that the ghost appears still in his armor from his last battle with the King of Norway. Having made the “ghost” with his armor still on, could hit that something is unfinished or not right. With putting these ideas in Hamlet’s head they could advance their status in the kingdom by maybe killing off the new king or an important player in Hamlet. The ghost can be interpreted in many ways, and the way that I see the ghost is just another way to advance one self’s in the kingdom.
*In my first Hamlet blog I would like my readers to focus mostly on the mechanical conventions in my blog. Since this is the first blog without having a structured question i would like to know if my writting flowed and if I got my point across in my blog.
The first thing I would like to approach is, if the image of the ghost is real. I believe this depends on the reader and the writer. Obviously Shakespeare believes in the ghost/spirits aspects, and decides that he wants the ghost to represent something which is the late King Hamlet. Now if you were the reader and had a strong belief that ghost are not real and do not have any meaning to them, then this will have an impact on how you perceive the story. As for me ghost are not real, so reading this section in the play made me ponder the idea of the whole “ghost” thing as being a scheme.
The reason behind believing that the appearance of the ghost is a scheme is because the men who have claimed to seen this ghost might have something against Hamlet or his family. They could then use the appearance of the ghost to their advantage to persuade Hamlet with their thoughts and ideas. The men claim that the ghost appears still in his armor from his last battle with the King of Norway. Having made the “ghost” with his armor still on, could hit that something is unfinished or not right. With putting these ideas in Hamlet’s head they could advance their status in the kingdom by maybe killing off the new king or an important player in Hamlet. The ghost can be interpreted in many ways, and the way that I see the ghost is just another way to advance one self’s in the kingdom.
*In my first Hamlet blog I would like my readers to focus mostly on the mechanical conventions in my blog. Since this is the first blog without having a structured question i would like to know if my writting flowed and if I got my point across in my blog.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)